Cases 61 - 70 of 112
PETROSKY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHN PETROSKY and STEPHANIE PETROSKY
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY , ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL , ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEAL v. MEDICAL DEPT. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2016cv01590
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE LEAL
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPT. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2016cv01324
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDMONDS v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELISSA EDMONDS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, DONALD STECHSCHULTE and ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WHITE et al
as 2:2016cv00778
Plaintiff:
RODGER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WHITE, WARDEN OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, SUPERINTENDANT SCI PITTSBURGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TROIANO v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
DANIEL TROIANO, SR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GROGAN v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01436
Petitioner:
DUSTYN JAMES GROGAN
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUGHES v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2015cv01258
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA HUGHES
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY , ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL , ORLANDO HARPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MILLIGAN v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
RAMON LASHAWN MILLIGAN
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ORLANDO HARPER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL OVERSIGHT BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
