Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Berry v. Remington Arms Co LLC
as 4:2013cv00624
Plaintiff:
Randy Berry
Defendant:
Remington Arms Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrow v. Kelly et al
as 5:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Nicola Kelly, William Straugh, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Straughn et al
as 5:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
William Straughn, Steve Outlaw, Marvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2013cv05076
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A. Berry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morrow v. Kelley et al
as 5:2013cv00098
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
David Kelley, Erikka Boykin, Justin Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Does
as 5:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2013cv02069
Plaintiff:
Donna Berry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morrow v. Straughn et al
as 5:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
William Straughn, Steve Outlaw, Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James L Berry Trust v. Fidelity National Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2012cv00795
Plaintiff:
James L Berry Trust
Defendant:
Fidelity National Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001 National Insurance Flood Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
