Cases 61 - 70 of 1,237
Howell v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Nathan Waibl, Unknown Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Findley et al v. City of Independence, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ebony L. Findley and Charisse A. Brown
Defendant:
City of Independence, Missouri, Hunter Soule and Jamie Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilbon v. Goff et al
as 6:2023cv03139
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Laniece Wilbon
Defendant:
Daniel E. Goff, Diana K. Dean, Lisa G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brown v. Huhn
as 4:2023cv00502
Petitioner:
Reginald Geron Brown
Respondent:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eisenbach v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Brandon Eisenbach
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Corizon Health Inc., nka Tehum Care Services, Inc., Joy Dillon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdette v. Brown
as 4:2023cv00426
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Burdette
Defendant:
Randi Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
