Cases 61 - 70 of 397
Johnson v. Putman et al
as 4:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
Larry David Johnson
Defendant:
John Putman, Kerry Chism and Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Morris Lee Love v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2021cv01380
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant:
P. Shaffer, Van-Ness and B. Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harper v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Seth Harper
Defendant:
David Robinson, David Putnam, Crystal Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHISM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45617
Plaintiff:
ALONZO CHISM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2021cv02547
Plaintiff:
Mateem Malik Hudson
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Inc., CoreCivic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHISM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42727
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON ZACHERY CHISM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2021cv11801
Plaintiff:
Jamar Chism, Ashley Degruy, Kissy Elliot and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
