Cases 61 - 70 of 162
Anthenor v. Officer 11755 et al
as 0:2019cv61572
Defendant:
Officer Alyssa Alonso, Officer John Shefferman, Officer Robert Strout and others
Plaintiff:
Renel Anthenor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Young v. Rehka Halligan
as 19-2303
Defendant / Appellee:
REHKA HALLIGAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Christopher Young v. Jose Boggio, et al
as 19-1277
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CLARK, JOSEPH SILVA, ANDREA NORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Young v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan et al
as 1:2018cv02987
Defendant:
NFL Player Disability & Neurocognitive Benefit Plan and Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Young v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00992
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Young v. Lt. Jenkins et al
as 1:2018cv05718
Defendant:
Ms. Harris, Wexford Health Source Inc., Lt. Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Jim, et al v. Dept. of Hawaiian Home Lands, et al
as 18-16531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD U. JIM and CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS, COUNTY OF HAWAII, HARRY KIM and others
Macon v. Bustos et al
as 4:2018cv04144
Defendant:
Jeff Stulir, Ron Erickson, Chuck Hauser and others
Plaintiff:
Grieg Macon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunlop v. Bustos et al
as 4:2018cv04143
Defendant:
Jeffery Stulir, Ron Erickson, Chuck Hauser and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Dunlop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson et al v. Bustos et al
as 4:2018cv04145
Defendant:
Jeffery Stulir, Ron Erickson, Chuck Hauser and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Dunlop, Grieg Macon and Michael D Roberson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
