Cases 61 - 70 of 101
Cincinnati Bell, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Bell, Inc., Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, Cincinnati Bell Public Communications Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Google, Inc. v. Traffic Information, LLC
as 1:2012mc00002
Plaintiff:
Google, Inc.
Defendant:
Traffic Information, LLC
Movant:
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NECA-IBEW Pension Fund v. Cox et al
as 1:2011cv00451
Plaintiff:
NECA-IBEW Pension Fund
Defendant:
Phillip R Cox , Bruce L. Byrnes , Jakki L Haussler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arbino v. Cincinnati Bell
as 1:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
Tom Arbino
Defendant:
Cincinnati Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. Arrivalstar S.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Bell, Inc.
Defendant:
Melvino Technologies Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cincinnati Bell Inc. v. Traffic Information LLC
as 3:2010cv01453
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Bell Inc.
Defendant:
Traffic Information LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tom Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Comp
as 10-6148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM SEEGER
Defendant - Appellee:
CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC
Michael E. Plummer, PLLC v. CBD Media Finance, LLC, et al
as 10-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. PLUMMER, PLLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CBD MEDIA FINANCE, LLC, dba Cincinnati Bell Yellow Pages, CBD MEDIA LLC, dba Cincinnati Bell Yellow Pages and CINCINNATI BELL
EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00379
Plaintiff:
EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Cincinnati Bell, Inc., Research In Motion Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
