Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 83
United States of America v. The Premises and Real Property Located at 8-10 Thomas Street, City of Kingston, County of Ulster, New York
as 1:2009cv00479
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Premises and Real Property Located at 8-10 Thomas Street, City of Kingston, County of Ulster, New York
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Bamond v. The County of Ulster et al
as 1:2009cv03263
Plaintiff: Anthony Jr. Bamond
Defendant: The County of Ulster, Lewis C. Kirchnier, Michael Baum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
In Re: Pharmaceutical Case, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1196
: SHIRLEY GELLER, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA, TWIN CITIES BAKERY WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, CARPENTERS & MILLWRI, Carpenters & Millwrights of Houston and Vicinity Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LEROY TOWNSEND, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
: UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: M. JOYCE HOWE
Defendant - Appellant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOWELLCOME, INC. and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Doe v. County of Ulster et al
as 1:2009cv00092
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: County of Ulster, Ulster County Sheriff's Department and Jeffrey Geskie
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. The New York State Department of Correctional Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2008cv00793
Plaintiff: Joel Anderson
Defendant: The New York State Department of Correctional Services, Glen S. Goord, David Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lukaszewski et al v. County of Ulster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00483
Plaintiff: John Lukaszewski and James D. Grossi
Defendant: County of Ulster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
: UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutical
as 08-1190
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HAROLD BEAN, LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
: UNITED STATES, COUNTY OF ULSTER, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff - Petitioner: LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY, M. JOYCE HOWE and others
Petitioner: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR.
Defendant - Respondent: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, WARRICK PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.
Respondent: STEVE W. BERMAN
In Re: Pharmaceutica, et al, et al
as 08-8001
Not Classified By Court: SHIRLEY GELLER, UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, ACTION ALLIANCE OF SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA and others
Petitioner: DONALD E. HAVILAND, JR., LARRY YOUNG, THERESE SHEPLEY and others
Respondent: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, APOTHECON, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOSMITHKLINE and GLAXOWELLCOME, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?