Cases 61 - 70 of 98
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Curry's Personal Property
as 7:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Curry's Personal Property, Specifically, $70,953.41 in U. S. Currency, A 2004 Jeep Cherokee and others
Respondent:
Brenda Sue Curry
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Curry v. Sabbine et al
as 3:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marcus Curry
Defendant:
Nick Sabbine, Anne M. Tompkins, Haakon Thorsen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. USA
as 1:2011cv01099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MARCUS MAYHEW CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2011cv00852
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, MIKE FUQUAY, BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locklear v. Hubbard et al
as 5:2011ct03094
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Locklear
Defendant:
Mr. Hubbard, Dean Locklear, Eric Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZUNIGA v. THE CITY OF BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al
as 1:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO ZUNIGA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sgt. BRETT CURRIE and MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Locklear v. Thomas et al
as 5:2010ct03146
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Locklear
Defendant:
Sandra F. Thomas, Don Hunt, Mr. Maynor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY, et al v. STARMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2010cv00559
Defendant:
STARMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE CURRY and WILLIAM SHAWN BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRENT CURRY, JULIAN DOBY and R.M. FUQUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIE v. CREDITORS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
as 1:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CURRIE
Defendant:
CREDITORS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
