Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-13506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garrett v. Norris et al
as 3:2009cv00415
Defendant:
Lisa Grief, Roger Mosley, Nobel Winnigham and others
Plaintiff:
Tracey D Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hind General Hospital LLC v. Garrett
as 2:2010cv02082
Plaintiff:
Hind General Hospital LLC
Defendant:
Paul D Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ray D. Garrett v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77504
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Ray D. Garrett
GARRETT v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77504
Plaintiff:
RAY D. GARRETT and RAY D. GARRETT
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Garrett et al v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2009cv00404
Plaintiff:
Gordon D. Garrett, Gordon D. Garrett, Gordon D. Garrett and others
Defendant:
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company, State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company and State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Garrett v. Medical Technologies LLC
as 5:2009fj00001
Plaintiff:
Robert D Garrett
Defendant:
Medical Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00438
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
