Cases 61 - 70 of 346
T. v. Rockdale County Public Schools et al
as 1:2020cv04666
Defendant:
Rockdale County Public Schools, David Lesesne, Randy Goerner and others
Plaintiff:
D. D. T.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D&T Nail Lounge v. US
as 21-1218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D&T NAIL LOUNGE, FOOD FX INC., dba Murphy's Deli, VENEZIA NAIL SPA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CHANG v. WALLACE et al
as 1:2020cv15481
Plaintiff:
CINDI CHANG
Defendant:
D&T POOLS, LLC, WILLIAM A WALLACE, JR. and TRANSFORMATION ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CHANG v. WALLACE et al
as 1:2020cv15482
Plaintiff:
CINDI CHANG
Defendant:
D&T POOLS, LLC, WILLIAM A WALLACE, JR., TRANSFORMATION ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. D & T Property Management, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01241
Plaintiff:
Jeff Spurgeon, Christopher Allen and Joshua Martin
Defendant:
Floyd Ervin Dyess and D & T Property Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, LLC v. D & T Design Contractors, LLC, et al.
as 2:2020cv01759
Defendant:
D & T Design Contractors, LLC, et al., Jasmine Simonn, Yesina Millan and others
Plaintiff:
Preferred Contractors Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01792
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06625
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Reese McKinney, County of Montgomery and D. T. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
