Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Smith v. Franke
as 2:2015cv00666
Respondent: Steve Franke
Petitioner: Terry Darrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Moss, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00359
Plaintiff: Darrell Smith
Defendant: S. Moss and G Matteson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. People of the State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00279
Petitioner: Radford Darrell Smith
Respondent: People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Nash v. Michael Groose, et al
as 14-3142
Plaintiff - Appellant: Donald Nash
Defendant - Appellee: Darrell Smith and Michael Groose
Peric v. City of Lemoore et al
as 1:2014at00630
Plaintiff: Lupe Peric
Defendant: City of Lemoore , Darrell Smith , Jonathan Moritz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lupe Perico v. City of Lemoore et al
as 1:2014cv01328
Plaintiff: Lupe Perico
Defendant: City of Lemoore , Darrell Smith , Jonathan Moritz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00880
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Smith et al v. Harshaw et al
as 1:2014cv01605
Plaintiff: Darrell Smith and E&D Realty, LLC
Defendant: Candace Harshaw , Joy Collie , Brian Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. U.S.P.C -/EMPLOYEES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00597
Petitioner: ALVIN DARRELL SMITH
Defendant: U.S.P.C -/EMPLOYEES , F.B.O.P.'S /EMPLOYEES , DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mr. Alvin-Darrell Smith (RC) v. F.B.O.P.'S Charles E. Samuels Jr. et al
as 2:2014cv01713
Defendant: (USP) Victorville Staff, C/O Arualla, C/O Arualla and others
RC: Mr. Alvin-Darrell Smith

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?