Cases 61 - 70 of 142
Campbell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 1:2017cv10899
Plaintiff:
David Campbell and Glenda Campbell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp , Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as ALN/3:17-cv-00352
Plaintiff:
David Campbell and Glenda Campbell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp , Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
David Campbell v. DeWayne Burton
as 17-1310
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DEWAYNE BURTON
Campbell et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 3:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
David Campbell and Glenda Campbell
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barroca v. Arnold Aulepp et al
as 2:2016cv02822
Plaintiff:
Robert Barroca
Defendant:
Kristine Arnold Aulepp, Jason Clark, David Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv07187
Plaintiff:
Constance Campbell and David Campbell
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Hanless Napa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Constance Campbell et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. , et al
as 2:2016cv09253
Plaintiff:
Constance Campbell and David Campbell
Defendant:
Does, Hanlees Napa, Inc. and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Campbell v. Cook County et al
as 1:2016cv10600
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY vs. CAMPBELL et al
as 2:2016cv01013
Plaintiff:
TRUSTGARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
AMBER CAMPBELL and DAVID CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Congeniality, LLC v. Campbell
as 0:2016cv61566
Plaintiff:
Congeniality, LLC
Defendant:
Captain David Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
