Cases 61 - 70 of 500
Dibbern v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dibbern
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Anthony Kidwell, Jeffrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dibbern v. City of Bakersfield et al
as 1:2022at00444
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dibbern
Defendant:
City of Bakersfield, Anthony Kidwell, Jeffrey King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duong v. Ly et al
as 2:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ann Nguyen Duong
Defendant:
Vinh K. Ly, Quoc Minh Nguyen and Chelsea Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuentes et al v. Portier, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Jason Fuentes, Cynthia Fuentes and Alex Mendoza
Defendant:
Portier, LLC and Phuong Minh Duong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pena v. Pham et al
as 1:2022cv01700
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Pena
Defendant:
Bach Duong Pham and Vinh T. Phan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nguon v. Madden
as 3:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
