Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Joan Nanteza v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-1335
Petitioner: JOAN PAMELA NANTEZA
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General
Lent Carr, II v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 12-5048
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lent C. Carr, II
Defendant - Appellee: Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, United States of America, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Andrew Wolters v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7588
Petitioner - Appellant: ANDREW WOLTERS
Respondent - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General and WARDEN ZYCH, Prison Warden
Brud Rossmann v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 11-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant: Brud Rossmann
Defendant - Appellee: Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Defense, Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense and others
Lu v. Holder
as 11-3789
Petitioner: Liang Dong Lu, AKA Wen Kai Zhang
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Barbour v. Holder
as 11-2058
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. Attorney General, in his individual and official capacities
Thomas Jackson v. Marty Anderson, et al
as 11-2675
Petitioner - Appellant: Thomas Joel Jackson
Respondent - Appellee: Marty C. Anderson, in his official and personal capacity and Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, in his official and personal capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?