Cases 61 - 70 of 321
Armistead v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03109
Defendant:
Ms. Paige, Mr. Gary, Erik A. Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Armistead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy King v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6561
Plaintiff:
XAVIER KINNEY, MICHAEL BLANKEY, TIMOTHY BOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH LASSITER, MELANIE SHELTON, CYNTHIA THORNTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROYAL KING
Rodriguez-Garcia v. Tart et al
as 5:2021ct03102
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Erik A. Hooks, Michael Tart and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Regan et al
as 5:2021ct03098
Defendant:
Doctor Carlson, Erik A. Hooks, Michael Regan and others
Plaintiff:
James Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown-Bey v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03088
Defendant:
Erik A Hooks, Shanticia Hawkins and Roy Cooper
Plaintiff:
Eddricco Brown-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Regan et al
as 5:2021ct03086
Defendant:
Warden Godfrey, Michael Regan, Erik A. Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
John L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown-Bey v. Cooper et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Eddricco L. Brown-Bey
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Erik A. Hooks and Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00159
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Schnebelen v. Erik Hooks
as 21-6209
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID SCHNEBELEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSH STEIN, North Carolina Attorney General, MIKE SLAGLE, Mountain View CI Superintendent and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of Department of Public Safety, this respondent was initially named as other Kenneth Beaver
Hinton v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021ct03044
Defendant:
John Herring, Erik A. Hooks, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
