Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Ewert v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00660
Plaintiff:
Susan Ewert
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Starr v. Brooklyn Park, City of et al
as 0:2012cv03083
Defendant:
Brooklyn Park, City of , Matthew Ewert and Jamie Angerhofer
Plaintiff:
Tajaray Starr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Michael Ewert v. Ebay, Inc.
as 12-17251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EWERT, on behalf of himself and for the Benefit of all with Common General Interest, any Persons Injured, and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EBAY, INC.
Morris v. Holder
as 12-3517
Petitioner:
Lawrence Ewert Morris
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
United States of America v. Ewert
as 3:2012cv03196
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Louisa Ewert
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Quanta Services, Inc. et al v. LiveLine Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02398
Defendant:
LiveLine Solutions, Inc., Larry Ewert and Nathan Ewert
Plaintiff:
Quanta Services, Inc. and Quanta Services of Canada, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Michael Ewert, et al v. Ebay, Inc.
as 10-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL EWERT, on behalf of himself and for the Benefit of all with Common General Interest, any Persons Injured, and all others similarly situated and THE MISSING LINK, INC.
Defendant - Petitioner:
EBAY, INC.
Ewert, Vicki v. New York Life Insurance Company
as 3:2010cv00332
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ewert
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ewert v. H2Oil Recovery Services Inc., et al
as 10-8048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. EWERT
Defendant - Appellee:
H2OIL RECOVERY SERVICES INC., a Georgia corporation, 212RESOURCES, a fictitious business name for H2Oil Recovery Services Inc. and JOHN DOES 1-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
