Cases 61 - 70 of 198
Smith v. Louriero et al
as 3:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Smith
Defendant:
Louriero, McCool, Griffiths and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WEICKSEL et al v. GRIFFITHS et al
as 2:2016cv00596
Plaintiff:
MICKEY A. WEICKSEL and THE HONEST HARDWORKING TAXPAYING CITIZENS OF AMERICA WHO BELIEVE IN TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS
Defendant:
PATRICK GRIFFITHS, KENNETH HITE, N. SEWAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2016cv00549
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L. COOPER
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, FRANK GREEN, GRIFFITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. HARMOTTA et al
as 3:2015cv00297
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. KING
Defendant:
DIANE HARMOTTA, M. VEIL GRIFFITH and DOUGLAS LENGENFELDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DARRYUS et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSANGER CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv05789
Plaintiff:
GRIFFITH DARRYUS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSANGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
FOSTER v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. FOSTER
Defendant:
CHARLES MAIORANA, WILLIAM R. FINK, CHARLES JR. SAMAELS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEELEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01269
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. NEELEY
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., JULIO M. ALGARIN, WILLIAM J. CATANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
