Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 36,560
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant: COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Damme v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02143
Plaintiff: Henry Van Damme
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Clarke v. City of North Las Vegas et al
as 2:2024cv01046
Plaintiff: Karyl Clarke
Defendant: City of North Las Vegas, Clark County School District, Brenda Larsen-Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PINCK v. SOMERSET PROBATION
as 3:2024cv06686
Plaintiff: DAVID HENRY PINCK
Defendant: SOMERSET PROBATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
US v. William Horne, IV
as 24-6534
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM HENRY HORNE, IV
Schlumberger Technology CorporationIn re: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
as 24-50446
Petitioner: In re: Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Respondent: Trever Guilbeau, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Christopher O'Mara, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Henry Herbert, Jr.
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner: BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent: TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jhon Alvarado-Valencia
as 24-11856
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JHON HENRY ALVARADO-VALENCIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11455
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jane Doe 11 v. Jarecki We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv04208
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 11
Defendant: Henry Jarecki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?