Cases 61 - 70 of 283
Kellough et al v. Westgate Resorts, Ltd., L.P., et al
as 4:2020cv00707
Plaintiff:
james acree, Kenner Nadermann, barbara bowsher and others
Defendant:
Westgate Resorts, Inc.,, WESTGATE VACATION VILLAS, LLC, WESTGATE GV SALES & MARKETING, LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01200
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHIAL JAMES MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
as 1:2020cv10925
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Mitchell and James Mitchell
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv54182
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberson v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell Roberson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Land, et al
as 2:2020cv00634
Defendant:
Ernest James Mitchell and Land
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 lc
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22309
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. CDOC-CTCF Medical et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Dawn Anderson, Vani Russell and CDOC - CTCF Medical
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10061
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Woodall
as 3:2020cv00130
Defendant:
Robert E. Woodall
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
