Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 79
USA v. Kenneth Tiedemann
as 14-50425
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH DANIEL TIEDEMANN
Shaw v. Merit Systems Protection Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv05856
Plaintiff: Kenneth Daniel Shaw
Defendant: Robert A. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bechard v. Hubbard, et al
as 2:2014cv10789
Defendant: Penske Leasing and Rental Company , Pilot Air Freight, Corporation and Kenneth Daniel Hubbard
Plaintiff: Tammy Bechard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03162
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Palmer v. The Maryland Parole Comission We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02904
Plaintiff: Kenneth Daniel Palmer
Defendant: The Maryland Parole Comission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Committment Dept. of Division of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02740
Plaintiff: Kenneth Daniel Palmer
Defendant: Committment Dept. of Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02566
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Barfell v. Beaman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00283
Plaintiff: Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant: Nicholas Beaman, April Netzel, Carrie Koepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kenneth Chrestensen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-30045
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH DANIEL CHRESTENSEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00289
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?