Cases 61 - 70 of 90
A.B. et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
A.B. , Ann Barber , M.F. and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. , Pfizer International LLC , J.B. Roerig & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Q. et al v. THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION et al
as 4:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
A. C. Q. , A. Y. C.B. , A. E. C.B. and others
Defendant:
THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION , D.R. Acquisition Corp. , Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laclede Gas Company v. St. Charles County
as 12-2755
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Laclede Gas Company
Defendant - Appellant:
St. Charles County, Missouri
Defendant:
L.F. Krupp Construction, Inc. and State of Missouri
L.F. v. Houston Independent School District et al
as 4:2012mc00034
Plaintiff:
L.F.
Defendant:
Houston Independent School District, Larry Craddock and Hans Graff
L.F., et al v. Houston Indep School District
as 12-20027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
L.F., by next friend Mary Ruffin and MARY RUFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LUECRETIA DILLARD, Hearing Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Laclede Gas Company v. St. Charles County, Missouri et al
as 4:2011cv01766
Plaintiff:
Laclede Gas Company
Defendant:
St. Charles County, Missouri and L.F. Krupp Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.F. et al v. ENGLEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2011cv05160
Plaintiff:
L.F. and V.F.
Defendant:
ENGLEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
L.F. v. Dillard
as 4:2011cv01089
Defendant:
Luecretia Dillard
Plaintiff:
L.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
