Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Matthews v. Lucas et al
as 1:2009cv01133
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Richland County and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthews and Charles Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Lucas et al
as 1:2009cv01134
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Richland County and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Brooks and Marlon Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Lucas et al
as 1:2009cv01131
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Richland County and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robertson and Johnny Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jemison v. Ansari et al
as 1:2009cv00844
Plaintiff:
Louis Carl Jemison, III
Defendant:
Jamal Ansari, Elbin Negron, Lee Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Lucas v. Prison Health Services et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lucas
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Dr. Peasant and Nurse Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Price v. Lucas et al
as 1:2009cv00118
Plaintiff:
Herman P. Price
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danny Brown v. USA, et al
as 08-4632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANNY BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
LEE LUCAS
Corniel et al v. Lucas et al
as 1:2008cv00792
Plaintiff:
Luis Corniel, Luisa Corniel, Joan M. Aristy and others
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Tim Shaffner, Timothy A. Hornung and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jason Westerfield v. United States of America, et al
as 08-4458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON WESTERFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE LUCAS, ROBERT CROSS and others
Douglas v. Lucas et al
as 1:2008cv01757
Plaintiff:
Frank Douglas and Frank Douglas
Defendant:
Lee Lucas and Robert Cross
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
