Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 581
NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER v. MULTIPLAN, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05967
Plaintiff: NORTH JERSEY BRAIN & SPINE CENTER
Defendant: MULTIPLAN, INC. , NIPPON EXPRESS USA, INC , GM FINANCIAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clayton, et al v. Macys
as 5:2017cv00751
Plaintiff: Leonaria Butler, Lisa Clayton and Annette Lifsey
Defendant: Macy's Corporate Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 - Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05670
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gagner v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
as 0:2017cv03357
Plaintiff: Dale Gagner
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. , Macy's Corporate Services, Inc. and Macy's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dana Ruth Lixenberg v. American Rag Cie II et al
as 2:2017cv05391
Defendant: American Rag Cie II, DOES and Macy's, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dana Ruth Lixenberg
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04074
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv04085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Calderon v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00633
Plaintiff: Elida Calderon
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv30089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes Orellana et al v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv05192
Plaintiff: Cinthia Carolina Reyes Orellana and Samya I Moftah
Defendant: Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. and Law Offices of Palmer Reifler and Associates, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?