Cases 61 - 70 of 406
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Nutkis v. Tegna, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02894
Plaintiff:
Norman Nutkis
Defendant:
Tegna, Inc., Howard D. Elias, David T. Lougee and others
McCune et al v. Shenzhen Shangfeng Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 4:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Ted McCune and F4PS LLC
Defendant:
Shenzhen Shangfeng Electronics Co., Ltd. doing business as Javoco doing business as Javoco-US
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
WHITFIELD v. TEGNA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TENGA, INC., HOWARD D ELIAS, DAVE LOUGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Waterman v. TEGNA Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01789
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
TEGNA Inc., Howard D. Elias, Dave Lougee and others
Landskroner v. Tegna, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Kevin Landskroner
Defendant:
Tegna, Inc., Howard D. Elias, Dave Lougee and others
O'Dell v. TEGNA Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02547
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
TEGNA Inc., Howard D. Elias, David T. Lougee and others
McCune v. JD Towing LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Sean McCune
Defendant:
JD Towing LLC and Jorge Duenas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
McCune v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Willie David McCune
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Kansas School Board Association et al
as 2:2021cv02492
Plaintiff:
A.R., Z.R. and Katie Roberts
Defendant:
Kansas School Board Association, Olathe School District Board of Education, Dr. Brent Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
