Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Green, Kiesser, Telb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorpe v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Thorpe
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Christopher Klien, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Costello v. Delorme et al
as 1:2011cv00417
Plaintiff:
Michael Costello
Defendant:
Tammy Delorme, Washington County of NY Support Collection Unit, Washington County Family Court Clerks (NYS Unified Court System) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 10-4754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and offical capacities, PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
PowerComm, LLC v. Holyoke Gas & Electric, et al
as 10-2327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
POWERCOMM, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLYOKE GAS & ELECTRIC DEPARATMENT, JAMES M. LAVELLE, BRIAN C. BEAUREGARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
