Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Lanoue v. City of Lauderhill et al
as 0:2013cv60627
Plaintiff:
Nadege Lanoue
Defendant:
City of Lauderhill , John Does 1-8 , Kevin James Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thompson v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv02071
Petitioner:
Michael Raymond Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
India Lynch, et al v. State of Alabama, et al
as 11-15464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIA LYNCH, by her parent, Shawn King Lynch, individually and on behalf of others, WENDELL PRIDE, JR., by his parent, Wendell Pride, individually and on behalf of others, IVY ROSE BALL, by her parent, Miranda Ball, individually and on behalf of others and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA and COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
:
SERVICE
HAWKINS v. HARKLEROAD
as 1:2011cv00600
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAYMOND HAWKINS
Respondent:
SID HARKLEROAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Sua v. Sylvia Garcia
as 11-71051
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAYMOND SUA
Respondent:
SYLVIA GARCIA, Warden
USA v. Michael Thompson
as 11-5227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAYMOND THOMPSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Michael Thompson
as 11-5156
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAYMOND THOMPSON
Michael Sua v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-56866
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAYMOND SUA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON and MATTHEW CATE
Contreraz v. Adams, et al
as 1:2004cv06039
Plaintiff:
Quetzal Contreraz
Defendant:
D. Adams , Darrow Hetebrink and Michael Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
