Cases 61 - 70 of 410
Bryant v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Robert Bryant
Defendant:
Tonya Parker and Rodney Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Dexter Payne, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Does
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Abby Golden
Defendant:
Does, Tonya Parker, Melissa Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breshears v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Breshears
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, W Gilliam, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tommy Holt
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, W Gilliam, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Samuel L Murphy
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, W Gilliam, Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staeden v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Adam Staeden
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Tonya Parker, Philliph Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hibbett Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Latasha Williams
Defendant:
Hibbett Inc, Hibbett Retail Inc, Hibbett Wholesale Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Shaver v. Culver et al
as 4:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Shaver
Defendant:
Shawn Culver, Robert Parker, Devin R Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaver v. Culver et al
as 5:2022cv05002
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Shaver
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Shawn Culver, Correctional Officer Devin R. Burton, Correctional Officer Christopher L. Thomesen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
