Cases 61 - 70 of 121
Chanel, Inc. v. chanel-outlet-salefr.com et al
as 0:2018cv61750
Defendant:
chanel-outlet-salefr.com, purseblog.co, bagsforsale.online and others
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Peprah v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Alex O Peprah
Defendant:
Cpl. G Williams , PFC Lux , DFC Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Rayford v. Bogalusa City, et al
as 18-30386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
BOGALUSA CITY, JOE CULPEPPER, Chief of Police, JAMES COCKRELL, PFC, Individually and As Police Officer of the Bogalusa Police Department and others
Henry Rayford v. Bogalusa City
as 18-30386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Henry Rayford
Defendant / Appellee:
Bogalusa City, Joe Culpepper, Chief of Police, James Cockrell, PFC, Individually and As Police Officer of the Bogalusa Police Department and others
Chanel, Inc. v. getreplicachanel.com et al
as 0:2017cv62426
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
getreplicachanel.com, 18h.info, e8bagg.co and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Seabrook v. Riley et al
as 2:2017cv02701
Plaintiff:
James Antwan Seabrook
Defendant:
Christine L Riley, Katherine McKeithan, Ellen Lanphere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damon Wilson v. Prince George's County, Md
as 17-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND and PFC GILL, ID #3361, Prince George's County Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gary Smith v. Officer J. Aita
as 17-6783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER J. AITA and THE CITY OF SALISBURY
Defendant:
SALISBURY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PFC J. SANDER, #1122, PFC J. DIMARE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
