Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 145
USA v. Raul Rodriguez-Argon
as 16-3873
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAUL RODRIGUEZ-ARGON
RODRIGUEZ v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2016cv06006
Plaintiff: RAUL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Raul Rodriguez-Cervante We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-51310
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAUL RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES
ORTIZ-LOPEZ et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff: JUAN ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA BARRIOS-IPUANA, JORGE LUIS SOLAR-CHIMA and others
Defendant: LORETTA E. LYNCH and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Arriola v. USA
as 3:2016cv00860
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Juan Raul Rodriguez-Arriola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Q Directional Drilling LLC, et al
as 5:2016cv00751
Defendant: Chesapeake Operating, LLC, Ok and Q Directional Drilling, LLC
Plaintiff: Raul Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Rodriguez v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv12286
Plaintiff: Raul Rodriguez
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Miguel Mujica
as 16-9751
Movant: In re: MIGUEL MARTINEZ MUJICA, a/k/a Raul Rodriguez
:
United States of America v. Rodriguez-Argon
as 3:2016cv50214
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Raul Rodriguez-Argon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arnold et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv06613
Plaintiff: Mark Arnold , Donald Bailey , Lorell Bernard and others
Defendant: Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?