Cases 61 - 70 of 168
Ebert v. Amalgamated Transit Union et al
as 2:2019cv00283
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union and Steel Valley Regional Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Renee Ebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) et al
as 4:2018cv40202
Defendant:
Kenneth Kephart, David Trabucco, James Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond R. Mason, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority v. Morrish-Wallace Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02591
Defendant:
ABC Corporations 1 - 3, Morrish-Wallace Construction Inc. and John Does 1 - 3
Plaintiff:
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02545
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02812
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
T.B. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv01298
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington State Department of Transportation, Central Puget Sound Transit Authority and others
Plaintiff:
T.B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Metro Regional Transit Authority et al
as 5:2018cv01752
Defendant:
Metro Regional Transit Authority and Akron City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Antione D. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
