Cases 61 - 70 of 1,519
USA v. Perez-Velasquez
as 23-40392
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Bonifilio Romeo Perez-Velasquez, also known as Romeo Perez-Bonifilio
Romeo v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Diana Romeo
Defendant:
DAVOL,INC./C.R. BARD, INC. and Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Salinas v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Salinas
Defendant:
Kimberly Perez, Romeo R Ramirez, Duval County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawtone-Bowles v. Thornburgh et al
as 1:2023cv04813
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lawtone-Bowles
Defendant:
Richard E. Thornburgh, Bradley W. Dougan, John G. Popp and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Deluca v. Chief Health Officer
as 2:2023cv14165
Plaintiff:
Romeo Alfred Deluca
Defendant:
Chief Health Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Ramirez
as 2:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Robert J Salinas, Sr
Defendant:
Romeo R Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023at00479
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevenson v. Thornburgh et al
as 1:2023cv04458
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Stevenson
Defendant:
Richard E Thornburgh, Bradley W Dougan, John G Popp and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Robert S Shafir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carlos Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
