Cases 61 - 70 of 1,290
S.C. Hotel, LLC v. Bayley Construction, LP
as 8:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
S.C. Hotel, LLC
Defendant:
Bayley Construction, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
S.C. Hotel, LLC v. Bayley Construction, LP
as 8:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
S.C. Hotel, LLC
Defendant:
Bayley Construction, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Tesky, Kal v. Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Kal Tesky
Defendant:
Bone & Joint Clinic, S.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
S.C. v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc. et al
as OHN/1:23-CV-00871
Plaintiff:
S.C.
Defendant:
Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, Inc
Brooks v. City of Sumter, S.C. et al
as 3:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reginald Brooks
Defendant:
City of Sumter, S.C., David Werchat, Earnest A. Finneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Seabrooke v. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Seabrooke
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and S.C. Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carricaburu et al v. Corsica Square S.C. LLC et al
as 1:2023cv21296
Plaintiff:
Zobeida Carricaburu and Luis Carricaburu
Defendant:
Corsica Square S.C. LLC and Kimco Realty Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Apexus Sesame Street L.P. v. S.C. Johnson & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02125
Plaintiff:
Apex Sesame Street L.P. and Apexus Sesame Street L.P.
Defendant:
S. C. Johnson & Sons, Inc. and S.C. Johnson & Sons, Inc.
Garvey v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Margaret Peggi Louise Garey and Margaret Peggi Louise Garvey
Defendant:
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
