Cases 61 - 70 of 465
Nationwide Property & Casualty Company v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:2016cv20150
Plaintiff:
Daysi Hernandez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Mediator:
Markel Arrizabalaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gall et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 0:2015cv04837
Plaintiff:
Christian Gall and Cheryl Gall
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co and Icon Health and Fitness Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv09278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Calabrese v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 3:2015cv02057
Plaintiff:
Rachel Calabrese
Defendant:
Amy Dardis, Sears Holdings Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robertson v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13713
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Robertson
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. et al
as 3:2015cv07114
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. and WINIX AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanato v. Sears Roebuck & Co
as 1:2015cv07486
Plaintiff:
James Sanato
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Deeds v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Judith Deeds and David Deeds
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Sears Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
