Cases 61 - 70 of 105
Hofland et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2012cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lynn A Hofland , Dan E Hart , Sandra K Hart and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Fisher v. Astrue et al
as 0:2012cv01933
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Fisher
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kaye et al v. Altendorf Trucking et al
as 2:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
Cheri Kaye , Joshua Ruman , Callie Ruman and others
Defendant:
Altendorf Trucking and Shari L. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv04113
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Thompson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Eckblad et al v. Travelers Insurance et al
as 2:2012cv00448
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Eckblad , Christine M Cagle , Susan M Clausen and others
Defendant:
Travelers Insurance , Elmwood Financial Corporation , Jess S Levin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Kavalin v. National Enterprise Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60820
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Kavalin
Defendant:
National Enterprise Systems, Inc. and JOHN AND JANE DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Bland et al
as 2:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Eugene H. Bland and Shari L. Bland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert J Amiot et al v. LNV Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv08960
Plaintiff:
Robert J Amiot and Shari L Amiot
Defendant:
Does, LNV Corporation and MGC Mortgage Inc
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
