Cases 61 - 70 of 256
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2019cv05620
Plaintiff:
Dr. Sher Ali Khan and Weiss Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mael et al v. Evanger's Dog and Cat Food Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv05469
Defendant:
Evanger's Dog and Cat Food Co., Inc., Nutripack LLC, Sher Services Company, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Mael, Guy Mael, Britney Morea and others
Petitioner:
Susan Thixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sher v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Debra Epsman Sher
Defendant:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 19-1220
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS GARNETT, Corrections Officer, KEITH PLOURD, Corrections Officer, TRACY MARTIN, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MAINE and WAYNE KLINE, Deputy Sheriff
Mael et al v. Evanger's Dog and Cat Food Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv06013
Plaintiff:
Carol Conway, Guy Mael, Angela Bertucci and others
Defendant:
Nutripack LLC, Evanger's Dog and Cat Food Company, Inc., Sher Services Company, Incorporated and others
Petitioner:
Susan Thixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Chhetri v. Whitaker
as 19-9502
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Acting United States Attorney General, and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting United States Attorney General,
Petitioner:
SHER B. CHHETRI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
