Cases 61 - 69 of 69
The Burlington Insurance Company v. Hilton Grill, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00673
Defendant:
Guadalupe Amador Gomez, Santos Hernandez, Hilton Grill, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Burlington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rubio et al v. American Pan & Engineering Co., Inc.
as 1:2009cv00529
Plaintiff:
Israel Magos Rubio, Santos Hernandez and Santos Sorto-Romeo
Defendant:
American Pan & Engineering Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez-Muniz v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Jose Santos Hernandez-Muniz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
USA v. Jose Hernandez-Muniz
as 09-40225
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE SANTOS HERNANDEZ-MUNIZ
Hernandez v. U.S. Government
as 6:2008cv00042
Petitioner:
Luis Orlando Santos Hernandez
Respondent:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hernandez-Carrera, et al v. Carlson, et al
as 08-3097
Petitioner - Appellee:
SANTOS HERNANDEZ-CARRERA and PABLO SANTIAGO HERNANDEZ-ARENADO
Respondent - Appellant:
KEN CARLSON, Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and E. J. GALLEGOS, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
PepsiCo, Inc., et al v. Lost Potros Distribution Center, LLC, et al
as 2:2007cv02425
Plaintiff:
PepsiCo, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc., PepsiCo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Los Potros Distribution Center, LLC, Santos Hernandez and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
