Cases 61 - 70 of 844
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Johnson v. Sears Holding Corp et al
as 4:2018cv01053
Plaintiff:
Essie Johnson
Defendant:
Sears Holding Corp , Sears Roebuck and Co , Sears Home Improvement Products Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Brooks v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 6:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S. Bank National Association v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv10537
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Sharon L. Davis, Evangeline Davis, Mark Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
BLYSTONE et al v. OWEN-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01165
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. BLYSTONE and BRIDGET BLYSTONE
Defendant:
OWEN-ILLINOIS, INC., ARVINMERITOR, INC. , CARLISLE INDUSTRIAL BRAKE & FRICTION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03355
Plaintiff:
ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC., ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. and SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONTE et al v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY CONTE and PAMELA D. MARSHALL
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VASQUEZ v. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 5:2018cv00967
Plaintiff:
NORA VASQUEZ
Defendant:
SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and SEARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv06426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
