Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Steven Diver v. Butch Jackson
as 12-7355
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MITCHELL DIVER
Respondent - Appellee:
BUTCH JACKSON, Superintendent
Burnett et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01211
Plaintiff:
Tennille Burnett , Kirista Odom , Ralph Johnson and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Joshua Mitchell
as 12-40523
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSHUA STEVEN MITCHELL, also known as Ryan Webb
HANCOCK BANK v. DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al
as 3:2012cv00159
Plaintiff:
HANCOCK BANK
Defendant:
DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, STEVEN MITCHELL DEVER, MITCH DEVER PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANCOCK BANK v. DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al
as 5:2012cv00083
Plaintiff:
HANCOCK BANK
Defendant:
DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, STEVEN MITCHELL DEVER, MITCH DEVER PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTENNIAL BANK v. DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al
as 5:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
CENTENNIAL BANK
Counter_claimant:
DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and STEVEN MITCHELL DEVER
Defendant:
DEVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and STEVEN MITCHELL DEVER
Counter_defendant:
CENTENNIAL BANK and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Diver v. Jackson
as 5:2011hc02155
Petitioner:
Steven Mitchell Diver
Respondent:
Butch Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glover v. Rockdale Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2011cv01377
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Neal Glover
Defendant:
Rockdale Sheriff Department, Thomas Jeff Wigington and Steven Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIVER v. JACKSON
as 1:2011cv00225
Petitioner:
STEVEN MITCHELL DIVER
Respondent:
BUTCH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIVER v. JACKSON
as 1:2011cv00185
Petitioner:
STEVEN MITCHELL DIVER
Respondent:
BUTCH JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
