Cases 61 - 70 of 385
ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. LAMASTRA et al
as 2:2020cv03090
Plaintiff:
ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. WESSNER, JR., CHEREE WESSNER, STONE HAVEN SERVICES, LLC D/B/A/ STONE HAVEN SUPPLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
STONE v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
as 2:2020cv00476
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN STONE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STONE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02333
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
DARLENE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF ANDREW DAVIS GOOD et al v. RODRIGUEZ-SANTANA et al
as 5:2020cv01431
Defendant:
JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS 1-10, BOROUGH OF AKRON, LANCASTER COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ANDREW DAVIS GOOD and KRISTIN GOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. KNEPPER et al
as 2:2020cv00594
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. STONE
Defendant:
LT. YUHOUSE, UNIT MANAGER TERRY KNEPPER and SGT. STRICKLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STONE v. HATHAWAY
as 2:2020cv00256
Respondent:
Judge RITA DONOVAN HATHAWAY
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M. STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MILLER v. STONE et al
as 2:2020cv01045
Defendant:
BURLINGTON STORES, INC., BONNIE STONE, BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY and others
Plaintiff:
SHEREAN YUVONNE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. STONE et al
as 2:2020cv00947
Defendant:
BURLINGTON STORES, INC., BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY, BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
SHEREAN YUVONNE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTHY MASONRY & CONCRETE, INC. v. JERSEY CAST STONE LLC
as 2:2020cv00453
Defendant:
JERSEY CAST STONE LLC
Plaintiff:
MCCARTHY MASONRY & CONCRETE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owen v. Birchard et al
as 3:2020cv00200
Plaintiff:
David Owen
Defendant:
DJO Holding Corp, L&D Stoneworks, Inc., Lance Birchard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
