Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Henderson v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Erica Henderson
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD., CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Trane US, Inc. , Crane Co. , Velan Valve Corp and others
Cross_defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD., CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
David Peterson v. The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company et al
as 5:2014cv00637
Defendant:
Does, The Scotts Company LLC and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
Plaintiff:
David Peterson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hensley et al v. Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barry Hensley and Bradley Welch
Defendant:
Scotts Company, LLC and EG Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Price et al v. Scotts Company LLC, The et al
as 1:2013cv03463
Plaintiff:
Jason Price , Raymond Klouser and Blake Litke
Defendant:
Scotts Company LLC, The and EG Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gregware v. THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv24581
Plaintiff:
James Gregware
Defendant:
THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duprey v. The Scotts Company LLC
as 8:2013cv03496
Plaintiff:
Robert Duprey
Defendant:
The Scotts Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ROSS v. THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC
as 0:2013cv62163
Plaintiff:
JEROME ROSS
Defendant:
THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Gadd v. The Scotts Company, LLC
as 8:2013cv02101
Plaintiff:
Carla Gadd
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
