Cases 61 - 70 of 486
Souza v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Souza
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Sibley v. Kane et al
as 5:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Troy Linn Sibley
Defendant:
Thomas Edward Kane, Tammy Kane and The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Acosta v. Kember Interiors, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Maria Pastora Acosta
Defendant:
Kember Interiors, Inc., Thomas Edward Hescott, Kentucky Cabinets & Flooring, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thomas Burke, Jr.In re: Thomas Burke, Jr.
as 22-5368
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR.
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden
Burke v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00047
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burke v. Crews et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Respondent:
Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson, Judge John R. Grise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Thomas Burke, Jr.
as 22-5145
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS EDWARD BURKE, JR.
Respondent:
AMY ROBEY, Warden
Taylor v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Linda I. Aponte
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. People of the State of Kentucky
as 1:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
People of the State of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tussey v. Pratt & Whitney Division et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Justin Tussey
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney Division, Quest Global Services NA, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
