Cases 61 - 70 of 535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Bergan v. U.S. Postal Service
as 4:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Richard Orin Bergan
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Tucker v. United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
as 2:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Tucker
Defendant:
United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cassandra Rodney v. U.S. Postal Office
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Rodney
Defendant:
United States Post Office and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Shepard v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2021cv06354
Plaintiff:
Harold L Shepard
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, U.S. Marshal Service and Taskforce, U.S. Postal Inspection Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zen Seifu v. Postmaster General of the US
as 21-4068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZEN SEIFU
Defendant / Appellee:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. Postal Service
WEINBERGER et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv02926
Plaintiff:
SHARON WEINBERGER, THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT and JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Lopez v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 2:2021cv00966
Plaintiff:
Gloria Lopez
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and Elvia Consuelo Antunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milano v. United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
as 5:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Brunella Milano
Defendant:
United States of America - U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Jin Rie v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 2:2021cv07193
Plaintiff:
Jin Rie
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
