Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Oregon Teamster Employers Trust v. USF Reddaway, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Oregon Teamster Employers Trust
Defendant:
USF Reddaway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
R+L Carriers, Inc. v. YRC Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01053
Plaintiff:
R+L Carriers, Inc. and R+L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
YRC Worldwide, Inc., USF Holland Inc, USF Reddaway, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McLean v. Wright et al
as 1:2009cv01471
Plaintiff:
Douglas McLean
Defendant:
Nathan D. Wright and USF Reddaway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
AIM Controls LLC v. USF Reddaway Inc
as 4:2008cv01662
Plaintiff:
AIM Controls LLC
Defendant:
USF Reddaway Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
May v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00839
Plaintiff:
Andrea May
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Fedex Corporation, New England Motor Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rocket Motorcycles, Inc. v. Arkansas Best Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00664
Plaintiff:
Rocket Motorcycles, Inc. and Rocket Motorcycles, Inc.
Defendant:
Arkansas Best Corporation, AVERITT EXPRESS, Con-Way, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
May v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01862
Plaintiff:
Andrea May
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Fedex Corporation, New England Motor Freight, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Rocket Motorcycles Inc v. Arkansas Best Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv01780
Plaintiff:
Rocket Motorcycles Inc
Defendant:
Arkansas Best Corporation, Averitt Express, Con-Way Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
