Cases 61 - 70 of 192
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC v. COLONIAL METALS CO.
as 5:2018cv03727
Defendant:
COLONIAL METALS CO.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and its Local No. 1693 v. LLFlex, LLC
as 3:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC and its Local No. 1693
Defendant:
LLFlex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Tecnocap, LLC v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO, CLC Local Union No. 152M
as 5:2018cv00119
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO, CLC Local Union No. 152M
Plaintiff:
Tecnocap, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Evonik Corporation
as 1:2018cv01203
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Evonik Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL , AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00367
Plaintiff:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL , AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and UNITED STEEL WORKERS LOCAL 5852-11
Defendant:
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
as 3:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers Local 12-4959
Defendant:
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC v. Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC
Defendant:
Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Wodaszewski et al v. Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv05564
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wodaszewski , Darrell Loutsch , Jesse A. Montez, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc. and Gerdau Ameristeel US Retiree Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. H.B. Fuller Company
as 5:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
H.B. Fuller Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Safer Chem Healthy Families, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 17-73390
Petitioner:
SAFER CHEMICALS HEALTHY FAMILIES, ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH STRATEGY CENTER and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
