Cases 61 - 70 of 921
Jackson County, Missouri v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Jackson County, Missouri
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00040
Petitioner:
A.C. Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chamness v. Centurion et al
as 4:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
William Ray Chamness
Defendant:
Centurion of Missouri, Laura Manford, Shanta Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Dolgencorp LLC
as 6:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
Jamie E Jackson
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Mark Kirby Jackson
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Fort Osage R-1 School District
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Olivia Grace Jackson
Defendant:
Fort Osage R-1 School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Anderson v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Anderson
Defendant:
MO Jackson County, Joe Piccinini and Jackson County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thompson v. Buckner et al
as 6:2023cv03002
Plaintiff:
James R Thompson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Katherine Barton, Dr. Ashok Chada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walker v. Jackson County Jail
as 4:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
Lyndell Russell Walker and Lydell Russell Walker
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
