Cases 61 - 70 of 4,000
Doe #057 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Doe #057
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe (KWS) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Doe (KWS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontana, Sr. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fontana, Sr.
Defendant:
William Lee, David B Rousch and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Christine Williams
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, CoreCivic LLC, Alexie Pruitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #055 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe #055
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #056 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
John Doe #056
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilliam v. Prince Health Group LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Steven Gilliam
Defendant:
Prince Health Group LLC and John Doe Lead Generator Identified as "P1 Solutions"
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Blehco 520, LLC et al v. The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Blehco 520, LLC, William Randolph Stinson, II and Ram Linga Reddy Dornala
Defendant:
The Timber Ridge Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
