Cases 61 - 70 of 486
YOUNG v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv01141
Petitioner:
DAVID YOUNG
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. FORESTALL
as 1:2022cv01079
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PSI YOUNG
Respondent:
K. FORESTALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL YOUNG
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MOBILE DRILL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
MOBILE DRILL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
RICHARD ALAN YOUNG and MT GEO-TECH TOOLS, LLC
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Holcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holcomb, Suzanne Crouch, Holli Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00684
Plaintiff:
CURTIS YOUNG
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNG A.K.A SANTA FE v. SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SERVICES INDIANA
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG A.K.A SANTA FE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SERVICES INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
