Cases 61 - 70 of 73,626
Gross v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04076
Plaintiff:
Shauna Marie Gross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Payne v. Henry et al
as 6:2024cv06021
Plaintiff:
Emmett Jerry Payne
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, Jeremy M Womack, Wyeth Champon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Williams
as 6:2024cv03115
Petitioner:
Juan Lopez
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Albert C. Burgess, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, WellPath, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tevin Randle
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Branden D Sims
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Ashley King, Shrika Green, Mary Mena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Elias et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mattrew Elias, Joseph Mahoney, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
