Cases 71 - 80 of 165,062
Pretel v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Francisco Valencia Pretel
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Calzada v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Evelio Calzada
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shelley v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Michael Clay Shelley
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 6:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weatherly v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
Rohn Michael Weatherly
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brantley v. Lumpkin
as 24-10363
Petitioner:
Ross Thomas Brantley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Calloway v. Terrebonne Parish Correctional Justice Complex et al
as 2:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Randell Simmons Calloway
Defendant:
Terrebonne Parish Correctional Justice Complex, Terrebonne Parish Correctional Justice Complex Medical Department, Louisiana State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Arias et al
as 7:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Herrado Jose Molina
Defendant:
David A. Arias, Sergio Martinez, Sgt. Alyssa D. Gurra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Reeves
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
George A. Sanders
Defendant:
Tate Reeves
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Casel
as 24-10360
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cecil Charles Casel, also known as CC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
