Cases 71 - 80 of 333
United States v. Rodolfo Anguiano, Jr.
as 21-2104
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodolfo Anguiano, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jose Anguiano Navarro v. Merrick Garland
as 21-70951
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO ANGUIANO NAVARRO
USA v. Valdez-Anguiano
as 21-40032
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel Valdez-Anguiano
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Anguiano v. United States District Court et al
as 4:2020cv00353
Defendant:
Aaron Taylor, United States District Court, United States Attorneys and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Anguiano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Chennette, et al v. Porch.com, Inc., et al
as 20-35962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE ROBB, NATHAN CHENNETTE, SCOTT GLUBAY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENTON MARRELLI, MATTHEW EHRLICHMAN, GOSMITH INC. and others
Dunbar v. Arnold et al
as 3:2020cv07235
Defendant:
E. Sanders, Dan Bloomfield, S. Arana and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anguiano-Navarro et al v. James River Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv01902
Plaintiff:
Salvador Anguiano-Navarro and Angel Anguiano
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company and James River Group, Inc. doing business as James River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PC) Rodriguez v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020cv01373
Defendant:
Fisher, B. Rodriguez, Gavin Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv05733
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ricardo Anguiano, Anthony Okon and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Alberto Aguiano v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv08730
Defendant:
Patricia Bradley, Bureau of Prisons, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Aguiano and Alberto Anguiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
